Table of contents

How to Secure AI Infrastructure: A Secure by Design Guide

Securing AI infrastructure means protecting the systems, data, and workflows that support the development, deployment, and operation of AI. This includes defenses for training pipelines, model artifacts, and runtime environments.

A secure by design approach ensures these defenses are integrated from the start and remain enforced across every phase of the AI lifecycle.

 

What created the need for AI infrastructure security?

The need for AI infrastructure security emerged alongside the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence across industries.

As we all know, organizations are using AI for everything from customer support to financial forecasting.

According to McKinsey's survey,
  • 78% of respondents say their organizations use AI in at least one business function, up from 72 percent in early 2024 and 55% a year earlier.
  • Respondents most often report using the technology in the IT and marketing and sales functions, followed by service operations.
  • The business function that saw the largest increase in AI use in the past six months is IT, where the share of respondents reporting AI use jumped from 27% to 36%.

But as reliance on AI grows, so does its risk surface. That includes the data it uses, the models it trains, and the systems that deploy it.

Here's the problem.

AI systems operate differently than traditional IT. They depend on large datasets, complex algorithms, and dynamic learning processes—each of which introduces its own security challenges.

 

A white graphic titled 'AI infrastructure security risks' features five vertically aligned rectangular boxes arranged in a slight arc across the center. Each box is labeled with a category and includes a list of associated risks. The upper left box, labeled 'Model data' in bold, includes the risks 'IP theft,' 'Parameter tampering,' 'Output manipulation,' and 'Reverse engineering inputs.' The top center box, labeled 'Training & inference data,' lists 'Data theft,' 'Introducing bias,' 'Privacy & confidentiality,' and 'Manipulation & poisoning.' The upper right box, labeled 'Infrastructure,' includes 'Device integrity,' 'Physical security,' 'Lifecycle management,' and 'Supply chain integrity.' At the bottom left, the box titled 'Compliance' lists 'Privacy regulations,' 'Data & AI model traceability,' and 'Evolving regulations (WH AI Bill of Rights, EU AU Acts…).' On the lower right, the 'Human' box includes 'Operations,' 'Access controls,' 'Insider threats,' and 'Policies & governance.' Each box has a bright blue circular icon above it, featuring simple white line illustrations representing each category. In the background are faint, gear-shaped outlines in light grey.

For example: Even a small amount of corrupted training data can cause a sharp drop in model accuracy.

And because many AI models are trained or deployed in distributed, cloud-native environments, the infrastructure supporting them often spans multiple platforms. Which makes it harder to secure.

Modern AI environments typically include edge devices, on-prem systems, and public cloud services. That distribution increases the number of potential attack surfaces.

Organizations with distributed AI deployments are likely to face more attacks than centralized setups. That includes threats like adversarial inputs, model inversion, and theft of proprietary models through exposed inference APIs.

"AI is useful but vulnerable to adversarial attacks. All models are vulnerable in all stages of their development, deployment, and use. At this stage with the existing technology paradigms, the number and power of attacks are greater than the available mitigation techniques."

On top of that, many traditional cybersecurity tools weren't designed for AI. They don't account for the ways AI pipelines can be poisoned, manipulated, or abused. (Though fortunately, more modern solutions are becoming increasingly available).

And as regulations around data privacy and ethical AI expand, the risks aren't just technical—they're also operational and reputational.

Which means organizations need security that's purpose-built for the way AI actually works.

Rectangular CTA banner with a teal background featuring a white icon on the left of a checklist with two marked boxes and a feather pen below it, enclosed in a dotted circular outline. To the right of the icon, bold white text reads: 'Understand your AI infrastructure risk. Learn about the Unit 42 AI Security Assessment.' Below the text is a white-outlined, rounded rectangular button with the words 'Learn more' centered in lowercase.

 

What is secure by design AI?

Secure by design AI means building security into every part of the AI system from the start. Not after the fact.

This approach treats security as a foundational requirement throughout the AI lifecycle. From data collection to model deployment, each phase should include controls that protect against misuse, data leakage, and manipulation.

A diagram titled 'Secure by design AI' shows two parallel columns labeled 'AI pipeline' on the left and 'Secure the infrastructure' on the right, each containing three vertically stacked components. Under 'AI pipeline,' the components are 'Data collection & handling,' 'Model development & training,' and 'Model inference & live usage,' each marked with an icon representing a database, process nodes, and a user. Mirroring them under 'Secure the infrastructure' are 'Secure the data,' 'Secure the model,' and 'Secure the usage,' aligned with the same iconography. A horizontal label at the bottom connects both columns and reads 'Establish AI governance.' On the far right of the image, three short gray phrases indicate attacker targets: 'Sensitive data being centralized & accessed for training,' 'Vulnerabilities in new AI apps built from APIs and supply chains,' and 'Inferencing attacks to hijack or manipulate behavior of the model.' These are connected by lines to a red circular icon labeled 'Attacker targets,' featuring a white outline of a hooded figure.

And it's not just a best practice. It's a critical necessity.

"AI must be Secure by Design. This means that manufacturers of AI systems must consider the security of the customers as a core business requirement, not just a technical feature, and prioritize security throughout the whole lifecycle of the product, from inception of the idea to planning for the system's end-of-life. It also means that AI systems must be secure to use out of the box, with little to no configuration changes or additional cost."

AI systems face risks that traditional IT doesn't.

Training data can be poisoned. Models can leak sensitive information or be reverse engineered. And again, distributed AI infrastructure introduces more attack surfaces than centralized systems.

Secure by design helps manage these risks.

It uses strategies like encrypted data pipelines, isolated training environments, and signed models.

It also includes operational safeguards like continuous monitoring, automated remediation, and controlled access.

Essentially:

Secure by design is about making AI trustworthy. Not just functional.

By embedding AI security early and maintaining it throughout, organizations reduce the chances of compromise and lay the groundwork for reliable AI deployment.

 

1. Secure the AI data pipeline

Securing the AI data pipeline is foundational because the pipeline is the primary way sensitive data enters and flows through the system.

And most attacks don't start with the model—they start here.

Many attacks on AI systems originate in the data pipeline, where training data and preprocessing steps can be manipulated before a model is even deployed.

A horizontal flow diagram titled 'Data pipeline security' illustrates stages in securing data for AI and machine learning systems. The pipeline begins on the left with 'Data stream ingestion,' represented by cloud and server icons inside a dotted box. An arrow leads to two dark circular icons labeled 'Clean data' and 'Transform data,' each containing symbolic graphics of a filter and a rotating process, respectively. These feed into a white box labeled 'Staging area' featuring a stacked disk icon. A line extends downward to another dark circular icon labeled 'Data integration' with interlocking lines, which then points right toward 'Data storage,' shown as a box with stacked hardware units. An arrow from data storage points upward to 'AI/ML apps,' depicted by a gear-and-circuit icon. A green label at the top reads 'Security, monitoring, and governance,' spanning the length of the diagram above the main flow.

Let's break it down:

Data encryption is the first line of defense.

Use industry standards like AES-256 for data at rest and TLS 1.3 for data in transit. This protects the pipeline from interception and unauthorized access.

Also consider field-level encryption.

It adds protection for sensitive attributes, even if another part of the pipeline is breached.

Access controls matter just as much.

Implementing Zero Trust access with robust role-based controls keeps users in their lanes. Multi-factor authentication reduces stolen credential attacks. And just-in-time access shrinks exposure windows dramatically. The less time someone has access, the lower the risk.

There's also the matter of key management.

Poor key handling often causes encryption failures—not the algorithms themselves. Hardware security modules (HSMs), distributed key management, and regular key rotation all help. Together, they make the pipeline harder to compromise.

Protecting the pipeline isn't just one step. It's a combination of encryption, access controls, and key management.

Get those right, and you close off one of the most common paths attackers take.

 

2. Secure model training environments

Model training is one of the most sensitive stages in the AI lifecycle.

Security incidents during the AI development lifecycle are increasingly common, and breaches affecting production models are no longer rare.

It involves processing large volumes of data, applying third-party libraries, and generating model artifacts that may later be deployed in production.

Diagram titled 'Secure AI model training environment' presenting the components and security layers involved in building AI models safely. The layout is segmented into five labeled sections:  Users (top left):  Icon of a user with an arrow pointing toward the development environment.  Perimeter (top center):  Contains three elements: 'Firewall', 'Zero trust access', and 'External monitoring'.  Secure development environment (top right):  Icon of a terminal window representing the coding environment for training.  Core security domains (center and bottom):  Infrastructure (blue): 'Containers', 'Dedicated training infrastructure', 'Network segmentation', 'Hardware security modules'.  Data (cyan): 'Encrypted data storage', 'Data classification', 'Access control'.  Monitoring & detection (purple): 'SecOps center', 'Audit logging', 'Threat detection'.  Development & training (orange): 'Model training pipeline', 'Model version & signing'.  Each section is connected with directional arrows, illustrating the flow and integration of security controls across infrastructure, data, and development workflows.

One of the most important steps is isolating training infrastructure.

Running jobs in dedicated environments that are logically segmented from other systems significantly reduces the risk of unauthorized access.

Why? Because it eliminates the lateral movement attackers rely on to exfiltrate training data or compromise the build process.

Dependency scanning is just as critical.

Open-source frameworks used in training workflows often contain vulnerabilities. By integrating automated scans into your CI/CD pipeline, you can catch outdated or insecure packages before they become a risk.

It also helps to track data provenance.

This creates a record of what data was used, how it was processed, and how it contributed to the final model. If something goes wrong—like data poisoning or unintentional bias—you'll be able to trace the source and take action.

Tracking provenance here lays the foundation for lifecycle-wide auditability.

For highly sensitive work, confidential computing may be worth considering.

It uses hardware-based isolation to protect data and model parameters during training. Even if an attacker gains access to the system, the model remains protected in memory.

All of these steps support the same goal: Make the training environment harder to compromise and easier to audit.

 

3. Protect model artifacts

Protecting model artifacts is essential for preserving the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of AI systems.

These artifacts include trained models, weights, configuration files, and intermediate outputs—all of which can be valuable intellectual property or potential targets for adversaries.

Why does this matter?

Because unauthorized access to model artifacts can lead to model theft, tampering, or replication.

Diagram titled 'How unauthorized access enables model theft and tampering' showing three vertical panels that describe different attack pathways:  Model theft (left panel with icon of a broken lock):  Reconnaissance: 'Identify storage locations (cloud buckets, repos, containers)'  Access: 'Exploit weak credentials, misconfigured permissions, or insider threats'  Exfiltration: 'Download model files, weights, and training data'  Monetization: 'Sell on dark web, use for competitive advantage'  Model tampering (middle panel with icon of a malicious face):  Infiltration: 'Gain write access to model storage or CI/CD pipeline'  Analysis: 'Reverse engineer model architecture and identify modification points'  Injection: 'Modify weights to create backdoors or alter specific behaviors'  Deployment: 'Poisoned model gets deployed to production systems'  Model replication (right panel with icon of a cloned box):  Data harvesting: 'Collect training data or model outputs at scale'  Architecture inference: 'Analyze model behavior to reverse-engineer structure'  Knowledge distillation: 'Use original model to train a replica'  Deployment: 'Launch competing service with stolen capabilities'  The layout illustrates a step-by-step breakdown of how attackers can exploit model systems for theft, manipulation, or duplication.

For example: A stolen model might be reverse-engineered to extract sensitive data or used to serve malicious purposes elsewhere.

Tampered models may behave unpredictably in production, causing incorrect outputs or even violating compliance requirements.

Securing these assets starts with access control. Limit access to trained models using role-based permissions.

And apply encryption at rest for storage and signing techniques to verify model integrity.

Organizations that use cryptographic model signing report far fewer incidents of unauthorized model modifications. Signing also enables quick detection of tampering before deployment.

It's also important to control how models are distributed and deployed.

Which is why using immutable infrastructure is important here too—this time to ensure that what gets deployed matches what was verified. Immutable infrastructure prevents configuration drift and unauthorized changes by requiring redeployment from trusted, versioned configurations.

Combine this with secure container practices and centralized secret management. Together, these measures can minimize exposure and help ensure that production environments match verified configurations exactly.

Treat model artifacts as sensitive assets throughout their lifecycle.

Lock down who can see them. Ensure what gets deployed is what was verified. And reduce the risk of model compromise by implementing controls before anything goes live.

 

4. Harden model deployment infrastructure

Once a model is trained, securing its deployment becomes just as important. Otherwise, attackers can tamper with models in production, steal IP, or manipulate outputs.

That's why model hardening should start with cryptographic signing. In the case of hardening infrastructure, it's about making sure production stays clean.

Diagram titled 'Hardened AI model deployment infrastructure' illustrating the security lifecycle of AI model deployment, divided into pre-deployment and post-deployment stages. The visual includes four main phases with icons and threat labels above each phase:  Scanning – 'Download' (magnifying glass icon):  Inputs: 'Foundational model' and 'Datasets'  Threats: 'Model infection' and 'Data poisoning'  Hardening – 'Tune' (tuning sliders icon):  Outputs: 'Fine-tuned model' and 'Training data'  Threats: 'Model hijacking' and 'Data poisoning'  Immutability – 'Verify' (shield icon):  Output: 'Production ready model'  Threats: 'Model theft' and 'Model hijacking'  AI firewall – 'Observe' (firewall icon):  Final stage: 'Production model'  Threats: 'Adversarial input', 'Leakage & offbrand', 'Prompt injection'  A horizontal flow connects each stage from scanning to firewall, showing how models and data evolve. The diagram emphasizes a structured defense approach from model creation to real-world deployment.

It allows you to verify that only approved models are being served. No silent swaps or tampering.

Here's why that matters:

Without validation, attackers can insert poisoned or backdoored models into your pipeline. So signing acts as a baseline check.

But that's not enough on its own.

Container security comes next.

Vulnerability scanning of model containers before deployment significantly reduces known exploitable flaws.

And immutability plays a different role here: It locks down the environment itself, not just the artifact.

The deployment environment should be treated as code and never changed manually to help prevent configuration drift. That keeps your infrastructure aligned with security-verified templates. It also makes rollbacks easier.

Finally, don't overlook secret management. Like model artifacts, secrets need protection. But inference adds new risks if keys are exposed.

API keys, credentials, and tokens used during inference should never be hardcoded. Centralized secret management systems lessen credential exposure.

They also help teams rotate and revoke credentials when needed, without redeploying the model.

A secure deployment infrastructure isn't just about one control.

It's the combination—signing, scanning, immutability, and secret hygiene—that closes the loop and helps models stay secure once they go live.

A bright teal banner features a white icon on the left and bold white text on the right. The icon shows a circular speech bubble containing a checkmark-tipped pen, enclosed by a dotted-line circle. A small biohazard-style symbol appears above the speech bubble. To the right, the headline reads: 'Test your response to real-world AI infrastructure attacks. Explore Unit 42 Tabletop Exercises (TTX).' Below it, a rounded, white-outlined button is labeled 'Learn more' in lowercase letters.

 

5. Defend inference-time operations

When AI models are live and producing results, they face a distinct set of security risks. This is called the inference phase. And it's often where attackers focus their efforts.

In production environments, the inference stage presents unique attack surfaces and is a known point of exposure in the AI lifecycle.

The reason is simple:

Because most deployed models respond to real-time user input. Which makes the model vulnerable to exploitation through that input.

Diagram titled 'Runtime vulnerabilities in the AI inference phase' illustrating how malicious prompts can exploit AI systems during inference. On the left, five types of vulnerabilities are listed in pill-shaped boxes:  'Prompt injection'  'Output manipulation'  'Model hijacking'  'Exfil of model functionality'  'Abuse of shared outputs'  All arrows point toward a central red square labeled 'Malicious prompt' (with an icon of a masked attacker), which then connects to the 'User interface' block, subdivided into 'User interface layer' and 'API layer'.  From there, the diagram flows to a white square labeled 'Trained model' (with a neural network icon), and finally to a red square on the far right labeled 'Harmful response' (with a speech bubble icon).  The image depicts how malicious inputs at runtime can trigger harmful or compromised outputs through manipulation of the model's interface or behavior.

For example: If a model doesn't validate what it receives, attackers can feed it malicious data (sometimes called adversarial examples). These are carefully crafted inputs designed to trick the model into producing incorrect outputs. Left unchecked, this can lead to safety failures, privacy violations, or system outages.

Here's how to prevent that:

Start with strong input validation.

That means checking inputs for formatting, length, and expected values before letting the model process them.

You can also apply preprocessing to clean and normalize data. When done right, these measures can block most malformed inputs before they ever reach the model.

Rate limiting is another critical safeguard.

It stops attackers from overwhelming the model with inference requests. This protects availability and prevents brute-force attempts to reverse-engineer outputs.

You'll also need runtime defenses. This kind of monitoring is distinct from general observability—it's focused on live model behavior, not just system health.

These are systems that watch for suspicious behavior during inference. Like sudden spikes in input frequency or patterns that resemble known attack techniques. When detected, the system can flag the behavior or halt the request.

The most robust approach?

Combine defenses.

Input validation, adversarial training, preprocessing, and runtime monitoring each help. But they're most effective when used together.

Don't treat inference as an afterthought.

It's one of the most exposed points in your AI infrastructure. And it needs protections purpose-built for real-time, high-volume use.

 

6. Monitor and respond continuously

Securing AI infrastructure isn't just about building in protections upfront. It's about staying vigilant after deployment.

Continuous monitoring helps detect issues early. Before they escalate into real problems.

Circular diagram titled 'Continuous monitoring & response cycle for AI infrastructure' showing an eight-step cycle divided into color-coded segments. Each segment includes an icon and label, arranged clockwise:  Yellow – 'Monitor system behavior continuously'  Purple – 'Establish behavioral baselines'  Teal – 'Detect anomalies in real time'  Blue – 'Trigger automated response playbooks'  Light blue – 'Initiate model rollback if needed'  Red-orange – 'Generate & retain forensic logs'  Orange – 'Feedback loop to refine detection'  (Back to top)  At the center, bold black text states: 'Continuous monitoring & response cycle for AI infrastructure'. The circular layout emphasizes the iterative nature of AI monitoring, detection, and incident response.

Organizations that implement continuous monitoring can typically detect anomalies much faster than those relying on manual or periodic checks. Which reduces the time it takes to identify and respond to potential issues.

That steady eye is key, because:

Most AI attacks don't happen all at once. They unfold gradually.

Beyond inference-time monitoring, broader system surveillance is key to long-term defense.

Monitoring system behavior, performance, and usage patterns lets teams identify anomalies quickly. Sudden shifts in input data, inference spikes, or abnormal model outputs might signal data drift, adversarial manipulation, or attempted model theft.

On top of that:

Behavioral analytics help establish a baseline. Once you know what “normal” looks like, you can flag deviations fast. Reliable detection tools will catch most suspicious activity—ideally with a low false positive rate when tuned properly.

And the longer your system collects behavioral data, the more accurate it gets.

But spotting issues is only half the job.

You also need a response plan. Automated playbooks speed up remediation and help reduce downtime.

Model rollback is another critical capability. Especially for recovering from attacks like poisoning or evasion. Rollback tools will make the recovery process much faster.

Finally:

Detailed forensic logs close the loop.

They provide context after an incident and help teams learn what went wrong. These logs should be tamper-resistant and retained for at least 90 days. That's because many sophisticated attacks start weeks before anyone notices.

Monitoring and response aren't one-time tasks. They're a continuous cycle that helps organizations detect, respond, and recover—before damage spreads.

A rectangular teal banner features a white icon on the left and bold white text on the right. The icon shows a simplified browser window with a stylized paper airplane logo in the center and a circular slider control below it, all enclosed within a dotted circle. To the right of the icon, the main heading reads: 'Want to see how real-time AI monitoring works? Take the Prisma AIRS interactive tour.' Below the heading is a white-outlined rounded button labeled 'Start demo' in lowercase letters. The design uses a solid teal background with white line art and text arranged in a clean, horizontal layout.

 

7. Apply Zero Trust across AI environments

Zero Trust is a security principle based on the idea that no user or system should be inherently trusted. Every interaction must be verified—no exceptions.

Circular diagram titled 'Zero Trust core principles' illustrating six foundational concepts of the Zero Trust security model. The center of the circle contains the title, while colored segments branch outward to connect with labeled principles and icons:  Risk-based adaptive access – gear icon with dotted rotation marks (top left, red segment)  Zero trust is a paradigm – padlock icon (top right, yellow segment)  Assume the presence of hostile actors – attacker silhouette icon (middle right, teal segment)  Establish identity – checkmark over user icon (bottom left, light blue segment)  Limited access – warning triangle icon (middle left, cyan segment)  The diagram conveys that Zero Trust is a holistic framework, not a single tool or technology. The source is credited as 'Gartner' at the bottom right.

In AI environments, that means applying strict identity and access controls at every stage. From data ingestion to model inference.

This becomes even more important in setups that rely on multi-tenant architectures or exposed APIs. Why? Because these environments increase the risk of unauthorized access, data leakage, or abuse.

As with pipeline protections, RBAC and JIT access limit exposure—but here, they're applied system-wide.

Role-based access control (RBAC) ensures each user has only the permissions they need. Just-in-time access adds another layer of security by limiting how long those permissions last.

And you should also implement microsegmentation within AI environments to prevent lateral movement and ensure workload communications are secure and isolated.

Together, these controls shrink the attack surface and reduce the impact of credential compromise.

Zero trust helps enforce the principle of least privilege across every part of the AI system.

 

8. Govern the AI lifecycle end to end

“Sixty-three percent of organizations either do not have or are unsure if they have the right data management practices for AI, according to a survey by Gartner. A survey of 1,203 data management leaders in July 2024 found that organizations that fail to realize the vast differences between AI-ready data requirements and traditional data management will endanger the success of their AI efforts.
In fact, Gartner predicts that through 2026, organizations will abandon 60% of AI projects unsupported by AI-ready data,” according to Gartner, Inc.

Lifecycle governance is about maintaining oversight of AI systems from start to finish.

That means managing how data is collected, how models are trained, how they're deployed, and how they're eventually retired.

A two-column diagram illustrates the components of AI lifecycle governance. On the right, a vertical list outlines six stages of the AI lifecycle: 'Strategy & design,' 'Data collection & processing,' 'Data model building,' 'Test & validation,' 'Deployment,' and 'Operation & monitoring.' Each stage is accompanied by a unique circular icon representing its function. On the left, four colored labels—'AI system & algorithms' in cyan, 'Data & development operations' in teal, 'Risk, impacts & compliance' in lavender, and 'Transparency & ownership' in blue—are aligned horizontally beneath a row of four icons representing system, data, compliance, and reporting. Colored lines extend from each label, connecting it to relevant stages on the right to show how each governance focus area applies across the AI lifecycle. The background is white, with thin lines visually linking the stages and categories.

Without governance, it's easy for security gaps to form.

Models may be deployed with unknown dependencies. Or drift away from their verified configurations. And if something goes wrong, it's hard to trace the root cause.

That's where governance controls come in.

Model versioning, rollback tools, cryptographic signing, and data provenance tracking all help.

As mentioned earlier in deployment and monitoring, these controls also play a key role in lifecycle-wide auditability. They make the system easier to audit and quicker to recover.

Lifecycle governance ensures that security isn't just a setup phase—it's maintained and enforced throughout the entire AI workflow.

| Further reading:

A rectangular teal banner features a white line icon on the left and bold white text on the right. The icon depicts a stylized browser window containing a diagonal paper airplane symbol and a horizontal slider below it, all enclosed within a dotted circle. To the right, the heading reads: 'See firsthand how to discover, secure, and monitor your AI environment. Get a personalized Prisma AIRS demo.' Below this, a white-outlined button with rounded edges contains the label 'Request demo' in lowercase letters. The layout uses white text and icons on a solid teal background with elements evenly spaced.

 

AI infrastructure security FAQs

AI infrastructure includes the data pipelines, compute environments, storage systems, models, and deployment layers that support the development and operation of AI systems.
Because AI systems introduce new risks. For example, models can leak data, pipelines can be poisoned, and inference endpoints can be exploited. Traditional tools weren’t built with these attack vectors in mind.
Securing models focuses on protecting the model itself—like weights, logic, and predictions. Securing infrastructure means protecting everything around the model too, including data, training environments, APIs, and runtime systems.
At every stage. From data ingestion and model training to deployment and inference. That’s the core idea behind secure by design—it’s not a one-time step.
Model provenance tracks the data, code, and configuration used to train a model. It helps organizations trace problems back to their source and verify whether a model is safe to use.
Previous What Is Artificial Intelligence (AI)?
Next What Is AI Prompt Security? Secure Prompt Engineering Guide